O dijagnostičkoj pogrešci s osvrtom na praksu
Dr. sc. Hrvoje Vojković, Gras Savoye Croatia d.d. Zagreb, Willis Towers Watson Group, Dalmatinska ulica 16, 10000 Zagreb; hvojkovic@gmail.com; ORCID ID: orcid.org/0000-0002-2531-2460
Sažetak
Središnje istraživačko pitanje jest problematika povrede pravila medicinske struke u kontekstu građanskopravne odgovornosti za liječničku pogrešku u dijagnozi. Kako bi se ostvarili ciljevi istraživanja, analizirani su teorijski i praktični elementi povrede pravila medicinskog tretmana liječnika u okviru dijagnostičkog postupka, koji konstituiraju obveznopravni odnos odgovornosti za štetu. Važan je segment istraživanja reprezentativna kompilacija hrvatske sudske prakse u proteklih 25 godina i relevantne prakse ad comparandum. Zaključno je utvrđeno da, s aspekta sudske prakse, građanskopravna odgovornost redovito postoji kada je riječ o tzv. fundamentalnim pogreškama u dijagnozi koje se najčešće svode na nepravilno provedene postupke čiji su rezultati korišteni kao činjenična osnova za postavljanje dijagnoze.
Ključne riječi: povreda pravila medicinske struke, građanskopravna odgovornost liječnika, dužna pažnja liječnika, povreda standarda medicinskog tretmana, dijagnostička liječnička pogreška
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3935/zpfz.72.4.05
Hrčak ID: 281833
URI: https://hrcak.srce.hr/281833
Stranice: 1101-1125
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
“On Diagnostic Error With Reference to Practice”
Hrvoje Vojković, Ph. D: Gras Savoye Croatia d.d. Zagreb, Willis Towers Watson Group, Dalmatinska ulica 16, 10000 Zagreb; hvojkovic@gmail.com; ORCID ID: orcid.org/0000-0002-2531-2460
Summary
The central research question is the issue of violation of professional rules of medical treatment by physicians in the context of civil liability for medical malpractice in diagnosis. In order to achieve the objectives of the research, the theoretical and practical elements of the violation of medical treatment of physicians within the diagnostic procedure, which constitute the mandatory relationship of liability for damage, were analyzed. An important segment of the research is a representative compilation of Croatian case law of the past 25 years, as well as relevant practice ad comparandum. In conclusion, it was found that, from the aspect of court practice, civil liability regularly exists when it comes to the so-called fundamental errors in diagnosis, which are most often reduced to incorrectly performed procedures, the results of which were used as a factual basis for making the diagnosis.
Keywords: civil liability of physicians, due care of physicians, violation of medical treatment standards, diagnostic medical malpractice
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3935/zpfz.72.4.05
Hrčak ID: 281833
URI: https://hrcak.srce.hr/281833
Pages: 1101-1125