Obogaćenje kao pretpostavka neopravdanog obogaćenja (stjecanja bez osnove)
Dr. sc. Petar Miladin, profesor Pravnog fakulteta Sveučilišta u Zagrebu, Trg Republike Hrvatske 14, Zagreb; petar.miladin@pravo.hr; ORCID ID: orcid.org/0000-0001-7884-5300
Dr. sc. Hrvoje Markovinović, izvanredni profesor Pravnog fakulteta Sveučilišta u Zagrebu, Trg Republike Hrvatske 14, Zagreb; hrvoje.markovinovic@pravo.hr; ORCID ID: orcid.org/0000-0002-5376-3461
Sažetak
Condictio indebiti, condictio causa data causa non secuta, condictio ob causam finitam, condictio ob turpem vel iniustam causam i, na koncu, condictio sine causa, tipični su kondikcijski zahtjevi koji tradicionalno pojednostavnjuju inače heterogen institut neopravdanog obogaćenja i čine ga pristupačnim ponajprije pravnim praktičarima. Zagovara se podjela na činidbene i nečinidbene kondikcije. Pretpostavka obogaćenja potvrđuje da se činidbenim i nečinidbenim kondikcijama ostvaruju različite zadaće te da se na njih primjenjuju različita pravna pravila.
Ključne riječi: neopravdano obogaćenje; stjecanje bez osnove; činidbene i nečinidbene kondikcije
Hrčak ID: 195555
Puni tekst: https://hrcak.srce.hr/195555
Stranice: 5 – 30
________________________________________________________________________________________________
Enrichment as the Requirement for Unjustified Enrichment
Petar Miladin, Ph. D., Professor, Faculty of Law, University of Zagreb, Trg Republike Hrvatske 14, Zagreb; petar.miladin@pravo.hr; ORCID ID: orcid.org/0000-0001-7884-5300
Hrvoje Markovinović, Ph. D., Associate Professor, Faculty of Law, University of Zagreb, Trg Republike Hrvatske 14, Zagreb; hrvoje.markovinovic@pravo.hr; ORCID ID: orcid.org/0000-0002-5376-3461
Summary
Condictio indebiti, condictio causa data causa non secuta, condictio ob causam finitam, condictio ob turpem vel iniustam causam and finally, condictio sine causa, are typical condiction claims that traditionally simplify the legal institute of unjustified enrichment and make it accessible primarily to legal practitioners. A different classification is presented by the authors – condictions are divided into so-called performance condictions and non-performance condictions. The performance condictions are characterized by the fact that the enrichment is caused by the performance which the creditor himself had provided to the debtor. On the other hand, the non-performance condictions are either caused by an intrusion into another person’s (creditor’s) legal sphere, or are a consequence of an event that neither the debtor nor the creditor is responsible for. The classification into performance and non-performance condictions more clearly indicates the function each of these categories has within the legal system. Requirements for a claim on the basis of unjustified enrichment are also systematized and different manifestations of unjustified enrichment are presented.
Keywords: unjustified enrichment; condictio; enrichment without cause; performance condiction; non-performance condiction
Hrčak ID: 195555
Full text: https://hrcak.srce.hr/195555
Pages: 5 – 30